Who is the bigger Degil, Jahat & Bodoh?

Degil, Jahat & Bodoh! (Stubborn, Bad & Stupid!)



My parents taught me not to call people by such names and much regretted that a learned "lawyer" and representative of an NGO like Mohd Khairul Azam Abdul Aziz uttered such words while even trying to talk about teaching one's children in the interview.

If he was confident of uttering such words, he must definitely be more intelligent which he claims to be and likened to what the Malays say "angkat bakul masuk sendiri (pot calling kettle black)."

It takes a bigger "orang degil, jahat & bodoh (stubborn, bad & stupid)" to identify another. He do have guts to come out in the interview to claim himself all this! Such individuals does not deserve to be a leader and would end up embarassing the country in the eyes of the world.

Now that there are picture evidenced that he wore a pro-ISA t-shirt and was part of the pro-ISA which had planned to demonstrate (very obvious that they could not garner sufficient support), we will wait and see if police would take action against him.

Since Home Minister had said that they the Government would take action against both anti and pro ISA, we will see if the actions speak louder than words. He had also indicated that he was expecting a worse scenario with his statement "not as bad as we had expected.." which clearly indicates that he had also expected the pro-ISA would demonstrate in confrontation.

In the interview, Mohd Khairul touched on many issues pertaining to the August 01, 2009 anti-ISA demonstration;

1. hartabenda awam rosak, he has done a good job doing all the surveys and would be good if he himself produce the list of "hartabenda rosak". If he does not have one, then one wonders what he claims holds truth though I would think that definitely there are but not as bad as potrayed by Mohd Khairul. The "kerosakan" could also be due to the demonstrators running helter skelter fromthe tear gas and chemical laced water. How about "kecederaan rakyat Malaysia" by the police?
2. accusing Anwar Ibrahim (PKR Advisor), Syed Ibrahim (GMI) Lim Kit Siang (DAP Advisor) and Mohamad Hadi Awang (PAS President) as pengganjur ("organizer") and perancang ("orchestrator"). Was he representing the law and had made the necessary investigation? Or merely passing a remark?
3. he claims that the whole world population of 7.3 billion and 27million Malaysians watched the proceedings on CNN and Al-Jazeera. It's a wonder as to how he knows everyone was following the event with great interest and not sleeping or working or seating by the roadside at CM! We have to wait for Mohd Khairul to submit this fact to Guiness Book of World Record for most viewed event which is much larger following than the World Cup!
4. he also claims the Government allows assembly in stadiums, well, that's only after August 01, 2009. Is there any stadium which is large anough to fit the rakyat whom had enough of the present Government?
5. "ISA alasan baik untuk polis tangkap mereka" - he had encouraged the ISA be set upon the 4 persons claimed to be the orchestrator before the event happened and isn't he blatantly proving how wrong the ISA can be used on individuals?
6. "Menteri tak ada kuasa guna ISA" - does he knows what he is talking about?
7. "penyamun dan perompak berpesta semasa polis kawal demonstrasi" - it does not need to wait for this event to happen, even without the event the crime rate has risen and is he trying to tell the police how to manage their resources to safeguard the country. Does he know that the police brought in 400 additional personnel from out of KL to assist on 01 August 2009?
8. he claims that the police had not taken action against him although he was wearing "pro-ISA" which clearly shows the double standard in enforcement. I'm sure if I had worn a "pro-ISA" and shouted anti-ISA slogans, I would still be arrested.
9. he branded anti-ISA demonstrators as "CRIMINALS"!!!! This is shocking! The real criminals are still out there wreaking havoc to the country's wealth and the public's monies for many years and till today actions had not been imposed on these criminals. May we ask WHY and who is the smooth criminal?
   

From this interview, PAS would now know that they have a "duri dalam daging" in their Sg Ramal branch/division. However, we hope PAS does not ask him to quit but this bigger degil, jahat and bodoh member quit himself since Pakatan Rakyat represents maturity and not tow the line individuals as in Barisan Nasional.

UPDATE
It's embarassing for a legal advisor not able to distinguish between application for membership and being a member here !!!!

Well enough said, don't be a hypocrite!